Name of the
Book: Between Jihad and Salaam-Profiles in Islam
Author: Joyce M. Davis
Publisher: Macmillan, London
Year: 1999
Pages: 339
ISBN: 0-333-77230
The global media is today awash with stories about
Islam and Muslims, negative for the most part, following the recent events
in New York and Washington, and the mounting fears of war between the West
and large parts of the Muslim world. Of particular concern seems to be the
question of how Islam looks at issues of democracy, peace and pluralism.
This book is a refreshing contrast to much western writing on the subject,
in that it allows participants in Muslim movements to speak for
themselves, instead of being viewed simply as objects for western critics.
Consisting of a series of interviews with seventeen Islamic activists and
leaders, this book offers interesting insights into what is undoubtedly a
complex and little-understood phenomenon.
Davis’ first point of departure is her assertion that Muslims, like all
other religious communities, are not a monolithic whole. They are
characterised by sharp, often violent, divisions. Islam, she argues, like
any other ideology, can be interpreted in remarkably different ways. Thus,
for instance, while some Muslims of the likes of Osama bin Laden and the
Taliban see all non-Muslims as irredeemable enemies of God who are to be
fought to the finish, others, such as many Sufis, see them as fellow
creatures of God deserving their love and compassion. The implications of
these divergent views for peace and harmonious relations between people of
different faiths is obvious. Davis seems to suggest that rather than tar
all Muslims with the same brush, alliances need to be made with those
Muslims who see their religion as positively enjoining inter-faith
dialogue and harmony, in a joint struggle for democracy, peace and social
justice. Contrary to common belief, Davis shows that Islamist movements
are not necessarily opposed to democracy. Indeed, as her interviews with
the Sudanese Hasan al-Turabi, the Qatari Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi and
Khurshid Ahmad, senior leader of the Jama’at-i-Islami of Pakistan show,
Islamist movements in many countries are, in fact, today key players in
the struggle against autocracies, military juntas, medieval-style
monarchies and dictatorships that are strongly backed by the United States
and other western powers who, ironically enough, see themselves as
torch-bearers of freedom and democracy. Most of Davis’ interviewees are
bitterly critical, and rightly so, of Western double-standards that insist
on human rights protection and democracy only when it suits Western
interests, while remaining conveniently silent on the suppression of all
forms of democratic dissent and opposition in Muslim countries with client
regimes in power. This is most glaring examples are to be found in the
case of oil-rich states in West Asia and North Africa, where Western
backing for repressive regimes is most readily apparent. As Islamist
leaders from this part of the world whose voices appear in this volume,
including such figures as Mahfouz Nahnah of the Islamic Society Movement,
Algeria, Rashid al-Ghannoushi of the Tunisian Rennaisance Party and Shaikh
Kamel al-Sharif of the International Council for Da’wa and Relief,
Jordan, make clear, Islamist opposition movements actually represent a
large constituency that sees itself as victims of decades of secularist
and monarchical or dictatatorial politics that have brought little or no
relief to those outside the charmed circle of a narrowly defined elite
class.The perceived antipathy noticed in several contemporary Islamist
movements towards the West is one of Davis’ major concerns. As Abida
Hussain, former Pakistani ambassador to the United States, Anwar Ibrahim,
former deputy prime minister of Malaysia and Ibrahim Ghosheh of the
Gaza-based HAMAS movement argue in their interviews, Islamic political
activism is not inherently anti-Western or necessarily opposed to people
of other faiths. Indeed some Islamists insist on the need for
inter-religious dialogue and understanding. However, they argue, the
West’s role in backing repressive secularist regimes in much of the
Muslim world and suppressing genuine democracy therein and its solid
support for Israel are major factors that have led some Islamist movements
to see the West in adversarial terms. The West, they argue, must shed its
colonial baggage and be willing to dialogue with Muslims on equal terms.
This would mean accepting that like all other peoples, Muslims, too, have
a right to lead their lives in accordance with their own traditions and
cherished beliefs. The presumed universality of Western culture is thus
shown as yet another form of imperialism, one which, because it is so
subtle and alluring, is in many respects even more threatening than direct
colonial control.
The question of women’s status and roles in Muslim society and in Islam
is also one that Davis occupies herself with. Her interviews with the
Egyptian Muslim women’s activist, Bint al-Shati, the Sudanese Wisal
Abdel Rahman al-Mahdi and the Pakistani Abida Hussain reveal a world of
confident women, rooted in a strong faith in Islam and at the same time
playing active public roles, as women and as Muslims. The Islamic
perspectives that these women offer, Davis shows, allow for considerable
space for women. While they admit the existence of patriarchal
interpretations of Islam, they insist on a reading of the tradition based
on its original sources, the Qur’an and the Hadith, by-passing centuries
of interpretation and commentary.As an archive of voices of leading
contemporary Muslim activists, this book is useful and insightful. Yet,
one gets the feeling that despite Davis’ attempts at allowing her
interviewees to speak for themselves, in the questions she asks and in her
commentaries on each respondent she betrays her Western biases, and her
own assumptions of western superiority often seem glaring. That, and the
absence of any voices from the world of Muslim minorities, Shi’as as
well as ordinary Muslims who are not associated with Islamist movements
make the book less promising than what its title suggests. This, however,
should not detract from the merits of the book, which make it essential
reading for anyone concerned with the question of Islam in the
contemporary world. q
|