Indian Muslim Leading Newspaper, New from India, Islam, World
32 pages, Twice a month. Subscribe Now.  (RNI DELENG/2000/930; ISSN 0972-3366)


 
Since Jan 2000

Cartoons .  Special Reports . National  . Issues . Community News Letters to the Editor  . Matrimonials . Latest Indian Muslim Statements . Book Store ++

Home 
Search
Subscribe Online
Archives

About Us
Cartoons

Online Book Store  
E-Greetings

Jobs @ MG

Advertise on MG
Our Team
Contact Us

Muslim Matrimonials
Our Advertisers

Add to your RSS reader - Indian Muslim Islamic News online media web site

»  Lastest Indian Muslim 
Statements & 
Press Release
s
Google
Web (WWW) OR  
only MG

  q
» Tell me when the next issue comes online:

Unsubscribe

 

 

  q

__________________

If you haven't seen the print edition,
you've 

missed it ALL

send me the print edition
__________________

  q

Babri imbroglio: Muslims taken for a ride
By Zafarul-Islam Khan

Continued from

Singhal shows the spot where they want to built the mandir

There is a feeling that the sudden build-up is a well-rehearsed drama in which the central government and the extremists are hand-in-glove, faking a stand-off in order to force the government to transfer the so-called 'undisputed' land to the Hindu extremists. This show became serious in the backdrop of the Gujarat events where close to one thousand people, mostly Muslims, have been killed usually by burning them alive. And the underlying message was that same will be repeated all over the country if the government did not acquiesce to the demands of the extremists. 

In this psychological build-up the government used the services of a top Hindu religious leader, Shankaracharya of Kanchi, who came to Delhi all the way from south India and held meetings with both Hindu extremists and representatives of the AIMPLB, a Muslim organisation which has been entrusted the issue of the Babri Mosque since the two Babri Action committees were discredited in the wake of the mosque's demolition in December 1992.

A proposal was made by the Shankaracharya, during a meeting he had on March 5 with an 11-member AIMPLB delegation led by its General Secretary Syed Nizamuddin. Speaking to MG, Board convenor, Dr Qasim Rasool Ilays, said that the Board will take a decision in its meeting on March 10, after taking into consideration all the issues. He said that both the Babri Action committees are represented on AIMPLB committee on the Babri. He added that we do not see any problem with the temple if we get our land back on which we will build the Mosque. If a settlement is arrived at now it will include the erection of a wall between the mosque site and the rest of the land. If the court decides in favour of Muslims that wall will remain intact and if the court verdict goes against Muslims that land will be handed over to the Hindu side, he said. But Dr Ilyas told MG that the Board's decision most probably will be in the negative.

The Shankaracharya said the Nyas (temple trust) chief Ramchandra Paramhans had given a written undertaking on the compromise reached between the two sides. This letter would be handed over to Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who would consult his NDA allies before coming to a decision on the issue. Shankaracharya said that the letter written by Paramhans to the Prime Minister also mentioned that the Temple trust had agreed to maintain status quo at the disputed site. But VHP Vice President Giriraj Kishore said the very next day that no such proposal had been made yet. "We have not taken any decision. If the proposal comes, the dharmacharyas (religious leaders) will decide on it, " he said. Kishore ruled out any compromise on the three demands made by the VHP on March 4 that all restrictions enforced in Ayodhya be lifted, shifting of carved stones to the undisputed site be allowed and the undisputed land be handed over to it before June 2 for the construction to begin. Regardless of the government's stand, Kishore said, material for the construction would begin to be moved to the so-called 'undisputed' land at 2.15 pm on March 15, and the construction would begin at the site before June 2, when the 108-day yagna (rites) ended. 

The cat was out of the bag on March 8 when State Minster for Home Swamy visited Ayodhya amid indications came from Delhi that the government will do exactly as the VHP demands. Only semantics have changed: now it is the Ramjanmabhoomi Nyas (trust) which will perform the puja.. (not the VHP)! Needless to the say, the Nyas is another name and platform for the same people. Nyas president, Ramchandra Pramhans, is a senior VHP leader. Now the Nyas will get the so-called ‘undisputed’ land. By a sleight of hand, Ashok Singhal, VHP president, will attend the puja in his ‘personal’ capacity! All this was decided in a family meeting of BJP, RSS (the principal Hindu extremist outfit) and VHP leaders with Prime Minister Vajpayee and Shankaracharya present.

Shankaracharya later announced that all parties have agreed to maintain status quo and will wait for the court verdict! Now the extremists will get free access to the so-called 'undisputed' part of the land where they will start building their disputed temple while the Muslim side will wait for the court verdict which may never come as the experience of the last fifty years shows since the Babri Mosque was usurped in the night of December 22-23, 1949.

The Muslim side has filed a petition in the Supreme Court yesterday to stop the convergence of the karsewaks (temple volunteers) in Ayodhya. This case will be heard on 13 March. Another petition has been filed in the Supreme Court to take notice of contempt of court by the VHP president, Ashok Singhal. This petition will come up for hearing on 15 March.

In another significant move, the Indian government on March 6 requested the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court to expedite the Babri-Temple case. Hitherto the case has been moving at a snail's pace. The Mosque-Temple case itself has been dragging in various courts for the last fifty years since idols were surreptitiously installed in the Babri Mosque in 1949. The Indian government petition impressed upon the Court that under the Acquisition Act of 1993, the Union of India was statutory receiver with the obligation to maintain status quo till the disposal of the suits. It was spending about Rs 300 million (US$ 6.5 million) annually in this regard. 

VHP vice president, Acharya Giriraj Kishore, was clear on March 6, on how far his rabble-rousing outfit is ready to respect the court verdict: "at no cost the Babri mosque will be allowed to be rebuilt at the disputed site. For all practical purposes, it was a temple of Ram. It is and it will remain so." Asked what would be the VHP's response if the court ruled in favour of Muslims, he said: "the court verdict cannot be against history. It was on the court's orders that the temple's locks were opened and there are court orders that uninterrupted' 'puja' (Hindu prayers) be allowed at the disputed site".

Delhi Jama Masjid Imam Ahmad Bukhari had understood the game when he said four days ago: the entire exercise is a move to "trap" the minority community.
q


Subscribe Now

Get Books from India at cheap attractive ratesArabic English High Quality translation

Help Relief, Welfare, development work in India - Zakat

Read books on Indian Muslim Islamic topics only on MG bookstore !


Subscribe 2 MG print edition | Muslim Educational Loan AidContact Us | Muslim Baby Names | OutreachIndia | Suggestions | Muslim  Islamic greeting cards

Bookmark The Milli Gazette

Privacy PolicyDisclaimer  © Copyright 2000-Present  Publishers: Pharos Media & Publishing Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, India