Indian Muslim Leading Newspaper, New from India, Islam, World
32 pages, Twice a month. Subscribe Now.  (RNI DELENG/2000/930; ISSN 0972-3366)

Since Jan 2000

Cartoons .  Special Reports . National  . Issues . Community News Letters to the Editor  . Matrimonials . Latest Indian Muslim Statements . Book Store ++

The Milli Gazette

Online Book Store  

Subscribe Online

Jobs @ MG
Our Advertisers
Our Team
Contact Us

»  Lastest Indian Muslim 
Statements & 
Press Release
» Tell me when the next issue comes online:






If you haven't seen the print edition,

missed it ALL

send me the print edition


» The Milli Gazette's Message Board:


2003: Indian Muslim Statements
For Latest Indian Muslim Statements click here
Archive of Indian Muslim Statements click here


Venkaiah Naidu Displays Legal Ignorance by Describing ASI Report as Conclusive or Ultimate Evidence for VHP’s Case
VHP and BJP should Now Commit 
Themselves to Accept Judicial Verdict

New Delhi, 29 August, 2003: Shri Syed Shahabuddin, President of the All India Muslim Majlis-e-Mushawarat (AIMMM), has issued the following Statement:

"The BJP President Shri M. Venkaiah Naidu has stated at his Press Conference in New Delhi on 27 August, 2003 that the ASI report is ‘conclusive’ and ‘ultimate evidence’ in support of the contention that the "Babari Masjid was constructed in 1528 on the site of a grand 10th century temple ….. after demolishing the temple."

Shri Naidu is intelligent enough to appreciate the legal status of the Report. It is nothing more than a piece of expert evidence tendered to the Court which shall be considered by it in the light of the comments by the parties to the title suit under hearing and perhaps additional expert evidences tendered by them. Then the Special Bench will assign the proper value and weightage to the Report and consider it alongwith other pieces of evidence before it, now or in future, on the specific issue which is only one out of 20 odd issues to be decided.

However, if Shri Naidu really thinks that this inspired Report by a subservient department of the Union Government gives him the master key to secure a favourable judicial verdict, why should he or his friends in the VHP go on repeating the plea for negotiations for an out-of-court settlement or for legislation? They should accept the jurisdiction of the court and commit themselves to accept the final judicial verdict.

Sd/- Syed Shahabuddin
N-44, Abul Fazal Enclave, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi - 110 025 Phone: 2632 6780 Fax: 2632 7346
  Email: q



Read and support The Milli Gazette 

O u t r e a c h I n d i a




Reading books can support The Milli Gazette !

Home | Dear Friends | How to join us | Subscription | Archives | Advertise | Contact Us | Publishers | Feedback | | SearchPublishers | Previous Highlights | OutreachIndia | Suggestions |
| MG's Discussion Board | E-cards Matrimonials | Latest Indian Muslim Statements |
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Milli | Free for All LinksBookmark this page |

Disclaimer  © Copyright 2000-Present    Pharos Media & Publishing Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, India