Beware of the Sarkari Musalmaan

In the previous issue of The Milli Gazette (1-15 December), it is reported that on 10 December 2011, former union minister Jagdish Tytler will be awarded with seven others in a function at India Islamic Cultural Centre (IICC), New Delhi, by Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Academy. The other names were those of Dr SY Quraishi, Chief Election Commissioner of India; Sanjiv Bhat, IPS officer (Gujarat); senior journalist Zafar Agha; Mohammad Najeeb Ashraf Chaudhri, chief income tax commissioner; Maulana Mohammad Haseeb Siddiqui, chairman of the Deoband Nagar Palika Parishad; Nusrat Gwaliari, an Urdu poet, and  Begum Rehana Andre, a social activist and educationist based in Mumbai.

The award has been named after Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar, a key figure of the Indian freedom movement, a leader of the Khilafat movement and the founder and first VC of Jamia Millia Islamia, now a prestigious central university in Delhi. The award is given on his birth anniversary every year. Though the reasons for honouring these people were not mentioned in The Milli Gazette report, the Academy’s general secretary explained that every year, the academy honours individuals in recognition of their extraordinary contributions in the field of journalism, politics, social service and so on. This year they chose Jagdish Tytler for his contribution to politics(!).

The name of Jagdish Tytler, one of the prime accused in the anti-Sikh pogrom of 1984, on the list of awardees created a furore among many activists, journalists and academicians. In response, they appealed to the seven others to decline the award. This appeal was subsequently endorsed by more than a hundred important people from across the world. The open letter said: “The undersigned appeal to the other seven awardees not to accept the award as a mark of protest against honouring Mr Tytler, whose contribution in the 1984 anti-Sikh pogrom has been recorded by several fact-finding reports, including those by PUCL and PUDR… It is regrettable that an award being given by members of a minority community is honouring someone who has played a key role in the victimisation of another religious minority.”

I called up the general secretary of the academy, M Saleem, asking if he would drop the name of Tytler from the list of awardees since there were quite a few people opposing this decision of his? Mr Saleem arrogantly replied: “There is no question of reconsideration of his name, leave alone the idea of dropping it.” He added: “There is nothing wrong with awarding Mr Tytler as no court of law has found him guilty.” When I told him that at least two of the awardees, Zafar Agha and Sanjeev Bhat, had informed some of the signatories of the appeal that they had declined the award, M Saleem said, “This is your illusion. You will see with your own eyes that they will come running to take the award!” There remains no doubt that he wanted to give an impression that people were dying to receive the award instituted by his academy.

After this, at a press conference in Delhi on 5th December, Zafar Agha said, “As a young journalist, I saw the anti-Sikh massacre of 1984 of Delhi and behind it was the hand of Mr Tytler amongst others. My conscience doesn’t allow me to accept this award and I have informed the organisers that I can’t receive it.” He also appealed to the co-awardees to reconsider their decision to accept the award.  Sanjiv Bhatt, in a message said, “Told them that I cannot accept an award or share a platform with Mr. Tytler.”

Some of us also contacted other awardees, requesting them to decline the award. While some of them were in a dilemma, others, like the poet Nusrat Gwaliari, seemed only too happy to get an award in the name of Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar, and lamely clarified their getting the award had nothing to do with Jagdish Tytler. They didn’t seem to agree with the appeal, which noted: “It is sad that the name of Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar is being misused. We are sure this is not how he would have liked his name to be remembered, and that he would not have approved of being used to white-wash the sins of a politician who was part of communal violence and mayhem in the capital of India.”

Next morning, an Urdu daily, Inquilab, said that the award refused by Zafar Agha was now to be given to Mr. Santosh Bharatiya, former MP and chief editor of a Hindi language weekly called “Chauthi Duniya”! The news was surprising as Mr Bharatiya always claimed to be a defender of the minorities and the marginalised. However, when contacted by a few journalists, asking whether he was accepting the award or not, his answer was both yes and no. To some, it was yes and to others, no.

Inquilab also quoted that the general secretary of the Jauhar Academy, M Saleem, had accused that those who were opposing the award were doing so to gain political mileage! Only he knows what benefits we were going to get from this, and from whom. In fact, it would not be wrong to say that it is the other way round. This reminds us of a song from an old Hindi film, Choron ko saare nazar aate hain chor… A thief sees everyone else as a thief. Mr M Saleem would like us to believe there is no politics in his award whose distribution ceremony would see a Congressman, Balram Jhakhar, as the chief guest, and whose guests of honour would include the president of the India Islamic Cultural Centre, a staunch BJP supporter.

Not having found any valid argument against us, M Saleem issued a press release, accusing those opposing the award to Jagdish Tytler of being backed by the BJP, and claiming that Zafar Agha’s press conference was held at a BJP MP’s residence at 3 Canning Lane! This was a blatant lie, as the press conference was held at the office of Shabnam Hashmi-led ANHAD at 21 Canning Lane, and not at 3 Canning Lane. But what are a few lies to help rehabilitate Jagdish Tytler in politics? For this purpose, M Saleem does not mind labelling one of India’s leading anti-communalism activists, Shabnam Hashmi, as a BJP stooge!

On the other hand, if one looks deeper into the Jauhar Academy, one finds that one of its patrons, also a “guest of honour” at the award ceremony, Mr. Sirajuddin Qureshi is well-known for his BJP links. He was one of the key members of the Vajpayee Himayat Committee, formed by a few opportunist Muslims to support the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance government in 2004, and to help it return to power. It was reported that Mr Qureshi’s name was being considered for the Chandni Chowk seat by the BJP in the 2004 Lok Sabha elections. Two years ago there were reports at the time of the elections of India Islamic Cultural Centre that he used his BJP links to get re-elected as the president of the centre.

Mr. Saleem and his ilk are part of a clan called the Sarkari Musalaman. They would support whosoever is in power, no matter what their policies and actions are. They are only concerned about their own benefits. Unfortunately, there is no dearth of such people amongst the Muslim community. Hence, we should not be surprised if tomorrow, the BJP comes to power and Naredra Modi becomes the home or prime minister, and they give him too this award, with a grand reception, and brush away people’s objections by saying he has not been held guilty by any court of law. As far as the India Islamic Cultural Centre is concerned, over a period of time it has become an adda of the Sarkari Musalman. Just go to its coffee house in the evening and see the people who gather there. At an institutional level too, it leaves no stones unturned to please the powers that be.

This year for instance, on 20 February 2011, it invited Delhi’s Lt. Governor Tejendra Khanna as chief guest at a Sufi Darbar. It should be noted that it was in the wake of the Governor’s Religious Committee that the Noor Masjid at the nearby Jangpura was demolished. It was this Lt Governor who vetoed a mandatory magisterial probe under NHRC guidelines) into the Batla House fake encounter. At that time also, several people made an appeal to the IICC president to cancel the programme of Lt. Governor but it fell to deaf ears.

Coming back to Jagdish Tytler and M Saleem, M Saleem sent another email in the evening of 8 December attaching a scanned copy of a letter by Jagdish Tytler saying that he will not attend the award ceremony to avoid “embarrassment” to the organisers and other awardees. To translate this, Mr Tytler means to say that now that an attempt to rehabilitate him has backfired, he might as well avoid bad publicity. However, that does not imply that M Saleem has withdrawn his decision to give the award to Tytler, just as he is willing to find replacement for Zafar Agha. M Saleem is not saying he has withdrawn the award to Tytler. This is a good example of what the key characteristic needed to be a Sarkari Musalmaan. (

Mahtab Alam is a civil rights activist and independent journalist. He can be contacted at

This article appeared in The Milli Gazette print issue of 16-31 December 2011 on page no. 1

We hope you liked this report/article. The Milli Gazette is a free and independent readers-supported media organisation. To support it, please contribute generously. Click here or email us at

blog comments powered by Disqus